The Kazakhstan authorities shut off the web nationwide on Jan. 5, 2022, in response to widespread civil unrest within the nation. The unrest began on Jan. 2, after the federal government lifted the value cap on liquid pure fuel, which Kazakhs use to gas their vehicles. The Kazakhstan city of Zhanaozen, an oil and fuel hub, erupted with a protest in opposition to sharply rising gas costs.
Instantly, there have been stories of web darkish zones. Because the demonstrations grew, so did the web service disruptions. Mass web shutdowns and cellular blocking had been reported on Jan. 4, with solely intermittent connectivity. By Jan. 5, roughly 95% of web customers had been reportedly blocked.
The outage was decried as a human rights violation meant to suppress political dissent. The deployment of a “kill swap” to quickly shut down the web on a nationwide scale renewed questions of the best way to curb the worldwide menace of digital authoritarianism.
As a researcher who research nationwide safety, cybersurveillance and civil rights, I’ve noticed how info expertise has been more and more weaponized in opposition to civilian populations, together with by slicing off the important service of web entry. It’s a part of an ominous development of governments taking management of web entry and content material to say authoritarian management over what residents see and listen to.
A rising downside
Governments utilizing a kill swap to dam web entry on a provincial or nationwide scale is rising. In recent times, it has occurred as a type of social management and in response to citizen protests in a number of international locations, together with
Burkina Faso, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Egypt, China and Uganda. The variety of web shutdowns is on the rise, from 56 instances in 2016 to over 80 instances in 2017 and not less than 155 blackouts documented in 29 international locations in 2020.
The correlation between the rising use of the kill swap and rising threats to democracy globally isn’t a coincidence. The affect of this development on freedom and self-determination is crucial to grasp as authoritarian governments turn into extra refined at controlling info flows, together with spreading disinformation and misinformation.
Authorized shutdown
Kazakhstan’s web is essentially state-run via Kazakhtelecom, previously a state monopoly. International funding and exterior possession of telecommunication corporations in Kazakhstan are restricted. The Kazakh authorities has the authorized energy to impose web censorship and management via each content material restrictions and shutdowns; for instance, in response to riots or terrorism.
Underneath Kazakh legislation, the federal government is empowered to “quickly droop the operation of networks and (or) communication services” when the federal government deems web communication to be “damaging” to the pursuits of an “particular person, society and the state.”
Citing terrorist threats, Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev paralyzed cellular and wi-fi companies for nearly every week and invited Russian troops into the nation to assist with “stabilization” within the wake of the protests.
The off swap
Kazakh authorities first tried to dam entry via Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) instruments to dam web communications, in accordance with a report in Forbes’ Russian version. DPI examines the content material of knowledge packets despatched via the web. Whereas it’s helpful for monitoring networks and filtering out malware, DPI instruments have additionally been utilized by international locations like China and Iran to censor webpages or block them fully.
DPI expertise isn’t an impermeable barrier, although, and might be circumvented by encrypting site visitors or utilizing digital non-public networks (VPNs), that are encrypted information connections that enable customers to defend their communications. When the DPI techniques had been insufficient for a national block, the authorities resorted to manually shutting off entry, although exactly how is unclear.
One risk is that authorities rerouted DNS site visitors, which is how domains lead folks to the proper web sites, or labored in collaboration with web operators to dam transmissions. One other risk is that the Nationwide Safety Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan has the capability by itself to dam entry.
Digital life interrupted
The results of the web shutdown had been instantly felt by the inhabitants. Political speech and communication with the skin world had been restricted, and the power of protesters and demonstrators to assemble was constrained.
Kazakhstan’s web shutdown hampered the power of protesters to prepare.
AP Picture/Vladimir Tretyakov
The web shutdown additionally hampered every day life for Kazakhs. The nation is extremely built-in into the digital economic system, from grocery purchases to highschool registrations, and the web outage blocked entry to important companies.
Up to now, Kazakhstan’s authorities has used localized web shutdowns to focus on remoted protests, or blocked particular web sites to regulate info and restrict the cohesiveness of protesters. Within the early days of the January 2022 protest, some in Kazakhstan tried to bypass web restrictions through the use of VPNs. However VPNs had been unavailable when the federal government disabled web entry fully in areas.
Concentrated energy, central management
The ability of the Kazakhstan authorities to institute such a widespread shutdown could also be proof of larger management of the centralized ISP than different nations, or probably an advance to extra refined types of telecommunication management. Both means, the shutdown of whole networks for a near-total nationwide web blackout is a continuation of authoritarian management over info and media.
Shutting off entry to the web for a complete inhabitants is a type of digital totalitarianism. When the web was turned off, the Kazakhstan authorities was in a position to silence speech and turn into the only supply of broadcast information in a turbulent time. Centralized state management over such a broad community allows tremendously expanded surveillance and management of knowledge, a robust instrument to regulate the populace.
As folks have turn into savvier web customers, as Kazakhstan demonstrates, governments have additionally turn into extra skilled at controlling web entry, use and content material. The rise of digital authoritarianism implies that web shutdowns are more likely to be on the rise as nicely.
[Get more science, health and technology news. Sign up for The Conversation’s weekly science newsletter.]
