Surrounding Earth is a strong magnetic subject created by swirling liquid iron within the planet’s core. Earth’s magnetic subject could also be almost as previous because the Earth itself – and stands in stark distinction to the Moon, which utterly lacks a magnetic subject right this moment.
However did the Moon’s core generate a magnetic subject prior to now?
Within the Nineteen Eighties, geophysicists finding out rocks introduced again by Apollo astronauts concluded the Moon as soon as had a magnetic subject that was as robust as Earth’s. However a strong magnetic subject requires an influence supply, and the Moon’s core is comparatively small. For many years, scientists have struggled to resolve this conundrum: how may such a small core create a powerful magnetic subject?
I’m a professor of geophysics and have been finding out Earth’s magnetic subject for greater than 30 years. I not too long ago assembled a workforce to make use of new scientific methods to reexamine the proof for lunar magnetization. We discovered that the Moon didn’t the truth is have a long-lived magnetic subject. Not solely does this discovering change the fashionable understanding of the Moon’s geologic historical past, it additionally has main implications for the presence of assets on the Moon that might be important to future human exploration.
Relative to the Earth, the Moon has a small core, and it isn’t apparent the way it may have created a powerful magnetic subject.
Rory Cottrell/U. Rochester, CC BY-ND
Why a magnetic Moon?
Sure rocks have the extraordinary means to protect data of previous magnetic fields once they comprise minerals with iron atoms that align with a magnetic subject because the rock cools and solidifies. The perfect magnetic minerals at preserving proof of a subject
are tiny – a thousand instances smaller than the width of a human hair – as a result of it takes a variety of power to rearrange their atoms.
Geophysicists who examine historic magnetism recreate this course of, reheating rock samples within the presence of recognized magnetic fields and evaluating the brand new alignment of the iron atoms with the orientation of iron atoms earlier than the rock was reheated. This enables researchers to find out about previous magnetic fields.
Early researchers finding out the primary rocks introduced again from the Moon by U.S. astronauts wished to make use of this methodology to review the Moon’s magnetism. However they confronted issues. Lunar rocks comprise a sure kind of iron – known as native iron – that’s simply altered by warmth. Moreover, the native iron grains in lunar rocks are generally comparatively massive, making them much less prone to reliably file previous magnetic fields.
From the Seventies onward, geophysicists used various, nonheating strategies to review the Moon’s magnetism. They discovered that some lunar samples had recorded robust magnetic fields, suggesting that the Moon had a magnetic subject for over 2 billion years.
However this consequence solely deepened the conundrum. The query of how the Moon’s core may produce a powerful magnetic subject remained unsolved.
Samples from the Moon, like this lunar basalt, are a posh mixture of many minerals, and just some can file alerts of previous magnetic fields. The white scale bar is 1 mm.
Kristin Lawrence, CC BY-ND
Another idea
Within the experiments, some Apollo samples confirmed proof of robust magnetic fields however different samples didn’t. Some researchers attributed the lacking magnetization to the presence of huge native iron grains that have been poor magnetic recorders. However lots of the samples additionally contained small iron grains that ought to have recorded a subject.
There have been long-standing doubts concerning the nonheating methods researchers used on the Apollo samples. Some scientists have known as them strategies of “final resort” and conclude that the uncertainties in knowledge collected on this means have been so massive that any interpretation should be considered as hypothesis.
Alternatively, one other group of scientists has recommended for many years that when meteorites strike the Moon, they create a dusty plasma – a fuel of ions and electrons – that might generate a powerful magnetic subject and magnetize lunar rocks close to the affect zone.
In 2008, geophysicist Kristin Lawrence determined to revisit the query of lunar magnetization utilizing an improved reheating method. In distinction to the researchers who initially studied the samples, she was unable to detect any definitive proof for a previous magnetic subject. The strategy Lawrence and her workforce used was higher than the nonheating exams, however her outcomes have been nonetheless not conclusive. She felt she was on to one thing, although, and that’s when she turned to me and my lab for assist.
By utilizing a brand new method, researchers have been capable of isolate and check tiny samples – just like the piece seen right here mounted inside a quartz dice – for magnetic proof.
Adam Fenster/U. Rochester, CC BY-ND
In 2011, Lawrence introduced us a set of lunar samples to check. We had been creating methods to determine particular person millimeter-size silicate crystals that comprise solely very small iron grains and have supreme recording properties. We then used an ultrasensitive superconducting magnetometer and a particular carbon dioxide laser to quickly warmth these samples in a means that avoids altering their iron minerals. We discovered that just about all of the rocks had profoundly weak magnetic alerts.
On the time of this primary check we have been nonetheless bettering the strategy, so we couldn’t say with certainty whether or not the samples had shaped on a Moon with no magnetic subject. However we’ve got been bettering our testing strategies, and final 12 months we determined to revisit the Apollo samples.
We definitively discovered that among the samples did certainly comprise magnetic minerals able to preserving high-fidelity alerts of historic magnetic fields. However the rocks had recorded no such alerts. This means that the Moon lacked a magnetic subject for almost all of its historical past.
So, what explains the earlier findings of a magnetic Moon? The reply was in one of many samples: a small, darkish piece of glass containing tiny iron-nickel particles.
This small piece of lunar glass was shaped and magnetized by a meteorite affect and will clarify the robust magnetic readings from the previous.
Rory Cottrell/U. Rochester, CC BY-ND
The glass was made by a meteorite affect and confirmed clear proof of a powerful magnetic subject. But it surely was shaped solely about 2 million years in the past. Almost all geophysicists agree the Moon didn’t have a magnetic subject at the moment, as a result of after 4.5 billion years of cooling there was not sufficient warmth left to energy the churning of iron within the Moon’s core to generate a subject. The magnetic signature of the glass matched simulations of magnetic fields that may be generated by meteor impacts. This confirmed that meteorite impacts alone can create robust magnetic fields that magnetize rocks close by. This might clarify the excessive values beforehand reported from some Apollo rocks.
Taken collectively, I imagine these findings resolve the thriller of a seemingly magnetic Moon.
Earth’s magnetic protect blocks photo voltaic wind, whereas the dearth of a magnetic subject on the Moon permits the photo voltaic wind to straight hit its floor and deposit parts.
Michael Osadciw/U. Rochester, CC BY-ND
Magnetic shielding and lunar assets
This new view of lunar magnetism has big implications for the potential presence of priceless assets in addition to details about the traditional Solar and Earth which may be buried in lunar soils.
Magnetic fields act as shields that stop photo voltaic particles from reaching a planet or moon. With no magnetic subject, photo voltaic wind can hit the floor of the Moon straight and implant parts like helium-3 and hydrogen into the soil.
Helium-3 has many purposes, however importantly, it might be a gasoline supply for nuclear fusion and future planetary exploration. The worth of hydrogen comes from the truth that it will possibly mix with oxygen to kind water, one other essential useful resource in house.
Because the Moon didn’t have a long-lived magnetic subject, these parts may have been accumulating in soils for billions of years longer than beforehand thought.
There’s additionally scientific worth. Parts embedded by photo voltaic wind may make clear the evolution of the Solar. And because the Moon passes by way of Earth’s magnetic subject, parts from Earth’s ambiance might be deposited on the lunar floor, and these might maintain clues concerning the earliest Earth.
The absence of a long-lived magnetic subject on the Moon may strike some as a loss, however I imagine it could unlock a scientific bonanza and a priceless stash of potential assets.
[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter.]
